The Mask of Benevolence Essay Example for Free

The Mask of Benevolence Essay The Mask of Benevolence BY sarniJ010 The Mask of Benevolence was really stunning to me and made me reconsider a great deal. I thought it was fascinating and charming that it examined the perspectives on most hearing individuals and discussed why they arent essentially right. A significant number of the realities, sentiments, and subtleties of how things had been managed in the past totally amazed me. One of the most amazing things for me was the manner by which each culture saw each other; which was practically all negative. Obviously, not all individuals in every classification have those musings. The book was an astounding perused for me since I had the option to see nd see a few things as the hard of hearing society does in light of the fact that the writer, Harlan Lane, was so explicit and clarified things through the contemplations she got notification from individuals inside the hard of hearing network. In the start of the book, Lane talks about how the hard of hearing society sees cochlear inserts and the oral correspondence of hard of hearing individuals. What's more, however I was uncertain why there was there was such a solid aversion of these things, it before long sounded good to me. Hard of hearing kids that are compelled to get an embed or to depend on oral correspondence lose all sense of direction in an in the middle of universe of hard of hearing and hearing. Path expressed, the embedded kid won't move effectively in the meeting scene, it is improbable that he will learn American Sign Language (ASL) easily and make his own crucial estimations of that network. So there is a genuine peril that he will grow up with no meaningful correspondence, spoken or marked. (p4). This was amazingly educational on the grounds that in spite of the fact that I had never thought adversely in any capacity about the hard of hearing network I had the feeling that clinical progressions and such embeds would be seen inconceivably profoundly to the hard of hearing. As most hearing individuals may be, I uppose I was essentially uneducated on the realities of cochlear inserts. Path asserts that the aftereffect of the errors between the embed and the regular system of hearing is a sound that numerous once in the past hearing grown-ups experience difficulty deciphering and some of the time in any event, limiting. (p219). On page 20, Lane recounts to a tale about a lady from a huge hard of hearing family and trusted beyond a reasonable doubt that her girl, as well, would be hard of hearing. Hard of hearing individuals don't wish to hear, they basically wish for individuals to be progressively mindful of their way of life. They are not weakened, they were just naturally introduced to a little culture; like eing Hispanic or Jewish, for what reason would you wish to wake up and be white one day? That isn't what your identity is. Path examines such a significant number of antagonistic things of how the conference think about the hard of hearing that totally overwhelmed me as well as caused me to feel appalled toward most of hearing individuals that do look down on the hard of hearing network. I was bewildered. I really never knew there were that numerous gullible individuals out there that considered hearing to be as that vastly improved and higher than the hard of hearing; basically on the grounds that I have never known any individual who believed that way and I never at any point thought about that! I was in stun when I saw Lane citing an American mental distribution from 1985 that expressed, Profound deafness that happens preceding the procurement of verbal language is socially and mentally decimating. (p35). Crushing?! The perspective on the hard of hearing from such a significant number of hearing is absurd! In the wake of citing the distribution, Lane went on the rundown a few attributes that the consultation culture has marked to every single hard of hearing individuals. These qualities included forceful, bad tempered, egocentric, and even bashful. How might an approaching individual know it a deat individual is sny or segregated? Hearing individuals see that the hard of hearing individual isn't speaking with them and consequently expected these things. In any case, how would you expect somebody who doesn't have a similar language as you talk and visit with you? That is amazingly selfishly of every single hearing individuals that feel that way. Also, that Just returns to hearing individuals anticipating that the hard of hearing should get familiar with our language. How unimaginably innocent! Dislike the Hispanic culture moving here that have the capacity and assets to learn English yet decline to. The hard of hearing have the most remarkable language on the planet and are suggest unfit to become familiar with some other language easily. How might you figure out how to communicate in a language fluidly when you can't hear it? As I Just expressed, gesture based communication, which I will allude to as ASL starting now and into the foreseeable future despite the fact that sign isn't elite to America, is essentially the most one of a kind language on the planet. What's more, those that deny it as a language are basically Just unfathomably uneducated. Something I discovered intriguing was when Lane talked about narrating in the hard of hearing network on page 16. She clarified how hard of hearing youngsters become familiar with the significance of narrating and they practice at an exceptionally youthful age. Path expresses that reasonable correspondence is exceptionally esteemed; stories ought to be wealthy in detail, start toward the start and end toward the end, and contain plain talk; indicating and dubious talk with an end goal to be obliging are unseemly and even frequently hostile (p16). How is that not discussing a culture with a rich language? Indeed, I feel just as the hard of hearing can really convey more than the consultation. Since in addition to the fact that they have the language as we do, their outward appearances and meticulousness are path past the normal hearing individual. Another point from at an opportune time in he book that I needed to talk about was a something that I could identify with. The part entitled The Paternalism Indictment examines the defect with the lessons for hard of hearing kids. That market is totally constrained by hearing individuals who scarcely comprehend the hard of hearing and their way of life thus it is all fundamentally based of generalizations. On page 49 Lane states, It is supposed to be led in light of a legitimate concern for hard of hearing individuals, however the benefits go only to hearing individuals. What's more, I got the chance to see this direct when I was a sophomore in secondary school. My long time closest companion, Rachel, was brought into the world rofoundly hard of hearing in one ear. She can hear fine and is not the slightest bit hard of hearing or a piece of that culture. She not even once required any extraordinary treatment in school. Anyway she used a listening device or speaker enclose rudimentary every now and then. All through center school and our first year of secondary school she kept up a quite high GPA. At some point while we were sophomores, she haphazardly got another calendar from the workplace. Following the new calendar, she went to her top of the line and found that they had placed her in all specialized curriculum classes. Clearly she was befuddled and pset, so she called her mom and they went to the workplace to sift through what was obviously an error. The workplace expressed that it was anything but a slip-up. Clearly, the school had been asserting Rachel as significantly hard of hearing, which she was in a single ear, and requiring the uncommon consideration of some other kid with an extreme weakness. Also, obviously, the school was getting enormous extra assets due to Rachels debilitation; Shame on the school for realizing that they would get extra advantages for guaranteeing Rachel. What's more, disgrace on the state so far as that is concerned for giving the chool additional assets in light of the fact that poor people school was Just so kind as to manage all of Rachels uncommon needs because of hearing hindrance. Path expressed there are paternalistic universals and parallax in the attributions, and a case to an acculturating trouble that neglects to veil the advocates monetary intrigue (p49).

Economics commentary †China set to introduce new rules on smoking in public Essay

George Bizek :: essays research papers

     Georges Bizet, who is most popular for his show, Carmen, has remained to some degree a riddle similar to his melodic instruction, public activity, and individual life. He isn't care for such a large number of different writers and artists of the Sentimental Period who drove a profoundly broadcasted life like Hector Berlioz, Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky, or Johannes Brahms. He went through his brief timeframe on earth committed to music what's more, he didn't exactly make it into the spotlight like these other Romantic writers. The most conceivable clarification for his indefinite quality would be the absence of embarrassment in his life. He had a glad adolescence, was all around granted with melodic grants, and a glad marriage.      Georges Bizet experienced childhood in a melodic house. His dad was a singing educator and his mom was a notable piano player who had gone to the Paris Studio. His folks empowered him in music. His dad was sure that his child would turn into an extraordinary performer. His dad was quite steady of his melodic instruction. He had been known to conceal youthful Georges' other textbooks so he would not be occupied from his melodic investigations. He gotten his first music exercise from his mom when he was only four years of age. She was encouraging him to peruse music simultaneously she was showing him his letters in order.      Bizet was taken a crack at the Paris Conservatory when he was nine years of age. This was an extraordinary special case orchestrated by his uncle who instructed at the Studio, since Bizet was as yet a year more youthful than the base age necessity. Here he concentrated piano, organ, singing, harp, strings, woodwinds, what's more, organization. His teachers were the authors Charles Gounod, who is known for his drama Faust, and who is viewed as the best melodic impact in Bizet's life. What's more, Jacque Halevy, who composed the drama LaJuive, is moreover thought about a significant melodic impact. He had an exceptional, unstructured educating style. Halevy would tune in to and right his understudies yet he would never expect them to do a particular kinds of structure. This was to influence Bizet for a mind-blowing duration as he would be known to begin and relinquish work after work. This was accused legitimately on Halevy's absence of order. At age fifteen, Halevy attempted to persuade Bizet to proceed to go after the Prix de Rome. Bizet denied locating his youthfulness and requirement for extra foundation.  â â â â During his time as an understudy he composed Symphony in C Major (1855), which was not performed during Bizet's lifetime, yet from it's first execution in 1935 it has become a built up ensemble in a standard collection. George Bizek :: articles look into papers      Georges Bizet, who is most popular for his drama, Carmen, has remained fairly a riddle similar to his melodic instruction, public activity, and individual life. He isn't care for such a significant number of different writers and artists of the Sentimental Period who drove an exceptionally broadcasted life like Hector Berlioz, Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky, or Johannes Brahms. He consumed his brief timeframe on earth committed to music also, he didn't exactly make it into the spotlight like these other Romantic writers. The most acceptable clarification for his indefinite quality would be the absence of embarrassment in his life. He had an upbeat adolescence, was very much granted with melodic grants, and a glad marriage.      Georges Bizet experienced childhood in a melodic house. His dad was a singing educator and his mom was a notable piano player who had gone to the Paris Studio. His folks energized him in music. His dad was certain that his child would turn into an extraordinary artist. His dad was very strong of his melodic instruction. He had been known to shroud youthful Georges' other textbooks so he would not be occupied from his melodic investigations. He gotten his first music exercise from his mom when he was only four years of age. She was instructing him to peruse music simultaneously she was showing him his letter set.      Bizet was joined up with the Paris Conservatory when he was nine years of age. This was a unique special case organized by his uncle who instructed at the Center, since Bizet was as yet a year more youthful than the base age prerequisite. Here he concentrated piano, organ, singing, harp, strings, woodwinds, what's more, creation. His teachers were the writers Charles Gounod, who is known for his show Faust, and who is viewed as the best melodic impact in Bizet's life. What's more, Jacque Halevy, who composed the drama LaJuive, is too thought about a significant melodic impact. He had a one of a kind, unstructured educating style. Halevy would tune in to and right his understudies yet he would never expect them to do a particular kinds of arrangement. This was to influence Bizet for an incredible duration as he would be known to begin and surrender work after work. This was accused straightforwardly on Halevy's absence of control. At age fifteen, Halevy attempted to persuade Bizet to proceed to go after the Prix de Rome. Bizet denied locating his youthfulness and requirement for extra foundation.  â â â â During his time as an understudy he composed Symphony in C Major (1855), which was not performed during Bizet's lifetime, yet from it's first execution in 1935 it has become a built up orchestra in a standard collection.

Jurors Asking Questions During Trials

The trend of jurors asking questions while a trial is going on is becoming more popular in courtrooms across the country. There are some states that now require it by law, including Arizona, Colorado, and Indiana. Many times highly technical testimony may alienate the average juror to the point where they stop paying attention and begin faking that they understand what is being said. Due to this, lawyers have become more reluctant to take cases where they risk verdicts that are derived from uninformed and bored jurors who do not understand the applicable laws. Case studies of trials that have been reviewed have shown that when jurors could ask questions during the trial, there were fewer incidents of verdicts that lacked a sound understanding of the evidence that was presented.​ CEATS Inc. v. Continental Airlines Experimentation has been done to gauge the effectiveness of permitting jurors to ask questions during trial. An example was in the CEATS Inc. v. Continental Airlines trial. Chief Judge Leonard Davis asked jurors to write down questions that they had after each witness testified. Out of earshot of the jury, the lawyers and judge then reviewed each question, which did not identify which jury member asked it. The judge, with attorney input, selected the questions to ask and informed the jurors that the selected questions were decided by him, not the lawyers, to avoid a juror getting insulted or holding a grudge because their question was not selected. The attorneys could then expound on the questions, but were specifically asked not to include the jurors questions during their closing arguments. One of the major concerns of allowing jurors to ask questions was the amount of time it would take to review, select, and answer the questions. According to Alison K. Bennett, MS, in the article Eastern District of Texas Experiments with Jurors Questions During Trial, Judge Davis said that the additional time added about 15 minutes to the testimony of each witness. He also said that the jurors appeared more engaged and invested in the proceedings and that the questions asked showed a level of sophistication and understanding from the jury that was encouraging. The Pros of Allowing Jurors to Ask Questions Most jurors want to render a fair verdict based on their understanding of the testimony. If jurors are unable to obtain all the information that they need to make that decision, they may become frustrated with the process and ignore the evidence and testimony that they could not decipher. By becoming active participants in the courtroom, jurors get a more in-depth understanding of courtroom procedures, are less likely to misunderstand the facts of a case and develop a clearer perspective on which laws apply or do not apply to the case. Jurors questions can also help lawyers get a feel for what they are thinking and can influence how lawyers continue to present their cases. It is also a good tool to reference when preparing for future cases. The Cons of Allowing Jurors to Ask Questions The risks of allowing a jury to ask questions can mostly be controlled by how the procedure is handled, although there are still other problems that may arise. They include: A juror who wants to display their superior understanding of the case or one that talks too much could become taxing and annoying to other jurors as well as add unnecessary time to the trial proceedings. It also puts lawyers and judges at risk if they display signs of fatigue or annoyance with trying to control someone with these characteristics. The fallout could result in the juror feeling alienated and resentful which could have a harmful effect on jury deliberations.A question could be asked that jurors feel essential, but in reality, has little legal significance to the outcome of the trial. Such a question could end up carrying too much weight when jurors begin their deliberations.There is also a risk that the questions not asked by a jury could imply that they do not understand the evidence being presented or realize the significance of the evidence presented. Alternatively, it may mean that they do not have additional questions because they completely understand what has been presented. This could put lawyers at a disadvantage. If the jury does not understand the evidence enough to ask questions, a lawyer may change their strategy and spend more time with testimony that helps explain the evidence. However, if the jury does have a full understanding of the evidence, additional time spent on the same information could be viewed as repetitive and boring and the lawyer risks being audibly muted by jurors.The risk of a witness answering a jurors question that has been rendered inadmissible.Jurors may take the position of being an adversary of a witness rather than being interested in all of the facts of the case.Jurors may rate the importance of testimony if a judge does not elect to ask a witness a jurors question. They may feel it is not an important testimony because it was not worthy of additional time spent to review it.A question may be allowed by a judge by mistake and become the reason the verdict is later appealed.Lawyers fear losing control over th eir case and trial strategy, especially if a question is asked by a juror that lawyers have purposely avoided mentioning during a trial. There is a concern that jurors with questions may decide on their verdict too early. Procedure Determines Success of Jury Questions Most of the problems that could develop from jurors asking questions can be controlled by a strong judge, through careful review of the questions and through using a proactive process through which jurors can submit questions. If the judge is reading the questions, and not the jurors, a garrulous juror can then be controlled. Questions that do not have significant importance to the overall outcome of the trial can be skipped. Questions that appear to appear bias or are argumentative can be reworded or discarded. However, it does give the judge an opportunity to review the importance of jurors remaining impartial until the trial is over. Cases Studies of Jurors Asking Questions Professor Nancy Marder, director of IIT Chicago-Kents Jury Center and author of the book The Jury Process, researched the effectiveness of juror questions and determined that the justice is fully served when a jury is informed and understands all the mechanisms that go into their role as juror, including testimony given, evidence shown and how laws should or should not be applied. She goes on to emphasize that judges and lawyers can benefit by taking a more jury-centric approach to court proceedings, which means considering questions that jurors may have through the jurors perspective rather through their own. By doing so will improve the performance of the jury as a whole. It can also enable a jury to remain present and focused on what is going on, rather than have them obsess on an unanswered question. Unanswered questions could promote a feeling of apathy towards the remainder of the trial if they fear that they have failed to understand important testimony. Understanding the Dynamics of a Jury In Marders article, Answering Jurors Questions: Next Steps in Illinois, she looks at the pros and cons of several examples of what can happen when jurors are permitted or legally bound to ask questions, and one major point that she mentions is in regards to the dynamics that occur among a jury. She discusses how within groups of jurors there is a tendency for those who failed to understand testimony to look to other jurors who they deem as being better informed. That person ultimately becomes an authority figure in the room. Often their opinions carry more weight and will have more influence over what the jurors decide. When jurors questions are answered, it helps create an environment of equality and each juror can participate and contribute to the deliberations rather than being dictated to by those who appear to have all the answers. If debate does arise, all jurors can inject their knowledge into the discussion without feeling uninformed. By doing this, jurors are more likely to vote independently, rather than to be overly influenced by a single juror. According to Marders research, the positive results of jurors moving out of passive roles of observers to active roles that allow them to ask questions have far outweighed the more negative concerns of lawyers and judges.​​​

plotlear Parallel Plots of Shakespeares King Lear Essay

The Parallel Plots of Shakespeares King Lear Many works of literature contain parallel plots in which similar actions taken by various characters precipitate identical results. Upon careful examination, it is evident that â€Å"such plots exist in Shakespeares play King Lear with the deaths of King Lear, Cordelia, Edmund, and Goneril, among others† (Curry 17). The betrayal of a commitment to an authority figure is the cause behind each of the above characters death. Likewise, the consistent loyalty of Kent, the Fool, and Edgar is rewarded when they outlive their traitorous peers. King Lear, who as a divine-right king derives his power from God, betrays Gods will when he transfers his kingdom to his daughters,†¦show more content†¦In the beginning of the play, Lear is in the process of dividing up his kingdom and confides in Kent that Goneril, Reagan, and Cordelia will each receive equal shares. Also, Lear decides that Cordelia should receive the more desirable central region of the kingdom. Before announcing his decision, Lear requests that each of his daughters declare her undying love for him in order to receive a portion of the kingdom. While Goneril and Reagan tell Lear what he wants to hear, rebellious Cordelia refuses to play along in Lears game and declares: I love your Majesty/ According to my bond, no more nor less (Shakespeare 4). Lear interprets Cordelias unwillingness to embellish as disloyalty and, as a result, grants her no land and disowns her. Cordelias refusal to declare her extraordinary love for her father was only her first traitorous act. After losing the land that was to serve as her dowry, Cordelia is married to the King of France. Cordelia owes the King of France much gratitude since marrying a bride without a dowry was a virtually unheard of practice at the time. However, Cordelia soon betrays her role as the Queen of France in Act IV Scene IV when she states: No blown ambition doth our arms incite, / But love, dear love, and our aged fathers right (Shakespeare 91). As the Queen of France, a longtime enemy of England, the objective of any invasion mounted by Cordelia should be

Ir The Iranian Identity - 3660 Words

Images from Iran: Iranian Identity in the Global World Globalization is defined as the ‘world becoming a small global village’ where all countries merge into a mosaic of one multicultural free communication of information village. Yet, if globalization is supposed to enhance the relationships between different cultures, making the whole world one nation, it drastically fails, due to the many differences between the world’s nations. Iran is one example of a country nation that has been detached from the global structure. With all the studies that have been made on Iran, the 1979 Revolution caused the West to treat Iran with great bias, in a similar fashion to the prevailing bias against the entire Eastern region. Iran has since been†¦show more content†¦I will analyze Iranian society, with reference to postcolonial theories employing different approaches. First, I will explain the general idea behind postcolonial theory, specifically orientalism, as it is one major approach in postcolonial studies. Then I wi ll look at some historical aspects of Iranian identity development, discussing various events that have affected the psyche of Iranians as a community. I will focus on Tehran’s metropolitan area as it is the major city in Iran. As an outsider to Iranian culture inside Iran I am aware that my approach will contain inherent bias, however, trying to limit this will be my goal throughout the essay. Also, limited space may not permit a long detailed view of all my research, but I shall attempt to convey my main point concisely. The main interest in postcolonial theory is what happens to people during and after colonialism. Splitting in straight lines self from other by purifying the self, is one discussion in postcolonial theory. Naturally, people view each other globally within the concept of ‘Them and Us’. One’s identity is often defined through encounters with differing cultures. Edward Said is considered the founder of postcolonial theory. In 1978 Said wrote a controversial book called Orientalism. He attempts to explain the geographical division between the West, the Occident and

Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics. Answer: Introduction Business ethics have always played a vital role in the growth and development of most business organizations by positively contributing to increased productivity by ensuring that business practices and operations are conducted by the organizational standards with the aim of meeting the organizational, individual and stakeholders expectations are met. Ethical standards or factors are therefore important in decision making especially when an unethical behavior occurs affecting the reputation of the organization as well as the stakeholders of the company (Burrell, 2017). Unethical dealing or behavior is acting outside of what an individual or organization considers being morally right or proper. Workplace ethics are important as they ensure that there is transparency in business dealings and builds investor or customer trust with an organization. However, an organizational ethical culture is shaped by effective leadership. Organizational leadership has however been faced with ethical di lemmas in which they find themselves in a situation to choose between two options neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable manner (Arnold, 2016). Various theoretical concepts or models have been developed to help in understanding the basis of ethical decision-making and leadership in many organizations who may be facing or accused of unethical dealings or experiencing ethical dilemmas. These theories include utilitarian theory, stakeholder approaches theory, the interrogative social contracts theory, the justice approach theory among others. This essay will therefore provide the theoretical framework of the unethical dealings of the Wells Fargo Company in which her employees were found to have created fake accounts in the name of their real customers. The creation of such accounts was found to be an unethical behavior or dealing and resulted to damaged reputation of the company as well as loss of customers confidence and trust with the company (Fryer, 2016). The study will also examine the application of the theoretical concepts, in this case, the utilitarian theory and the stakeholder theory in understanding the company uneth ical dealings and how they could be solved as well as why ethical behavior is important for the future growth and development of the company. Brief overview of the Wells Fargo Company Wells Fargo and Company is an international bank in America that works as a financial services holding company. It is the 10th largest bank in the world and has its headquarters in San Francisco in the US. It was formed by William Fargo and Henry Wells and has total assets of $ 1 930.12B. The company has been operating on three different segments including community and wholesale banking, wealth, and investment banking. It also offers retail, commercial services, and corporate banking to its customers through the internet and other distribution channels to individuals and other distribution, businesses and institutions in over 50 states in the US as well as in other countries (Cavico Mujtaba, 2017). The company has been faced with great ethical issues of concern since 2011 however through relevant investigations in the year2015 and 2016 it was found that the company employees were creating fake accounts in the name of real customers. According to the investigation by the Federal regulators, it was found that the company employees had secretly created millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts without the knowledge of their customers. This effect led to the accounts earning the banks unwarranted fees and allowed Wells Fargo employees to boost their salary figures and an opportunity to make more money (Francs-Gmez et al., 2015). Another reason for opening or creating the multiple accounts as investigated by the director or management of the consumer service financial protection Bureau found that the employees created these accounts to hit their sales targets and receive bonuses. This shoddy behavior led to the firing of 5300 employees form the company who were held responsible for the unethical behavior (Neesham Gu, 2015). From the investigation by the regulators, it was found that the employees had moved funds from existing customer accounts that ended up making the customers be charged with insufficient funds and overdrafts due to the insufficiency of funds in their original accounts. It was also found that the financial institution had submitted an application for 565 443 credit accounts without their customer's consent or knowledge was 14, 000 of these accounts were found to have incurred over $ 400000 in fees, including annual fees, interest charges and overdrafts (Kaptein, 2017). These charges were to be paid to the respective customers by the Bank in which the management of the company recognized its mistakes and committed itself to taking full responsibility irresponsibility of its workers that calls for a need to make a change to its sales practices as well as its internal oversight. Such unethical behavior by the employees as well as lack of oversight and internal control by the company, therefore, resulted in lack or reduction of customers confidence and trust and many customers have been advised to look for other banks to invest or make their deposits to. Such behavior has led to an increased burden of costs to the bank in paying for the charges and the overdrafts in the customers accounts as well as the burden of rebuilding its destroyed reputation. Organizations are required to act responsibly by practicing in ethical standards that ensure they achieve social corporate responsibility (Preuss et al., 2016). Theoretical perspectives of business ethics and decision-making Different theoretical concepts and school of thoughts have been developed to help different organizations make decisions and act appropriately in event of unethical behaviors in their organizations. The theoretical concepts and frameworks provide different insights and understanding of evaluating different behaviors in an organization to help minimize the occurrence of unethical behaviors with appropriate internal control mechanisms (Doh et al., 2016). Some of these theoretical frameworks include the utilitarian theory, the stakeholder theory and integrative social contract theory among others. However, this study will focus on the understanding of utilitarian theory as well as the stakeholder's approach theory in understanding the business ethics surrounding the situation faced by Wells Fargo and company in understanding her employees unethical behavior. The theory was developed and proposed by Jeremy Bethany and John Stuart Mills to help in understanding normative ethics that define the morality of individual or organizational actions. The theory is based on the principle that an individual or organization moral action is one that maximizes utility or happiness for the greatest number of people and the fact that actions are right or moral in proportion as they tend to promote happiness or well-being for the greater good of all (Rath, 2016). It is believed that any ethical theory, moral standards are separable into good and bad. The utilitarian theory argues that the good morals are defined as the existence of pleasure and absence of pain that is described as a utility. In this case, the utility is used to refer to any action that maximizes total benefit while reducing negative consequences of the largest number of people that simply means that something or a behavior is good if it does better than harm for many people (Cavico Mujta ba, 2017). This theory is one of the best-known and most influential moral theories and its main idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. And therefore the utilitarians believe that the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of ethical behavior for most business organizations and the corporate world at large (Yazdani Murad, 2015). The utilitarian reasoning can applicable for many purposes. One of the purposes includes moral reasoning by employees in the organization and for any rational decision-making. This theory, therefore, can be used in understanding the unethical behavior facing the Wells Fargo company and arising from her employees. Since the theory advocates for ethical behavior to be practiced for the greater good of all other people and not only for an individual gain it can be concluded that the employees of Wells Fargo Company did not mind about the company reputation and its social corporate responsibility to it s stakeholders and more so to the company customers. Criticism of the theory However the theory despite its importance in understanding business ethics it has been criticized by different scholars for a number of reasons in which according to them the theory does not meet their threshold of understanding business behavior. One of the critics of the theory has been that the theory has been criticized to be distasteful suggesting that the theory does not provide enough support for individual rights (Bhasa, 2017). The argument, in this case, is that it overemphasizes of moral actions that promote the greater good of all without taking into account the individual rights. If this critic were to hold true in our case it would mean that, the employees were right to create fake accounts so that they may hit their target. The creation of such accounts is not the case as it is a business ethics to conduct business operations having in mind the effect it will bring to all the stakeholders in the company that is what this theory was promoting and therefore this critic ca n be said to be irrelevant in making organizational decisions. The theory has also been criticized of impossibility meaning that the theory is not applicable in which the people criticizing the application of the theory based their idea on the fact that it is impossible to measure happiness or utility o consumers or customers. However, in our case, it is possible to measure the utility of the bank's customers based on their exhibited behavior towards the bank (Ayios et al., 2014). If the organization does not meet the demands and expectations of their customers then the customers will look for other banks, when the bank employees act in any unethical manner the productivity of the company is reduced as well as the confidence of the people with the bank that can be measured. Lastly, the theory has been positively criticized for insufficiency of the scope for not using some important source of information to explain happiness or satisfaction. The theory can integrate other sources of information in relation to the social corporate responsibility o f business practices for the theory to become even more relevant in the future (Fok et al., 2016). Personal evaluation of the theory and the unethical behaviors of the Wells Fargo Employees The theory of utilitarian on my personal perspective plays an important role in understanding the basis of acting morally under the principle that a good or moral action should be of maximum benefit to the greater population other than just an individual. This means that an individual before committing any unethical behavior he or she should look at the impact that action will have on other people before looking to the common good he or she would receive from such an act. In this case, therefore, the employees of Wells could have thought of the impact of their behavior to the customers and to the organizations at large before thinking of their personal motives that later did cost them their jobs and put the company into a financial crisis. The self-interests and motives of hitting their sales targets as well as increasing their income made them overlook the greater good of the company and its customers. The theory is therefore relevant and can be used by the organization to teach the employees about the importance of putting the interests of the customers first and conducting their business activities in an ethical manner. This theory was developed or proposed by Freeman in a bid to explain the concepts of business ethics in an organization. The theory suggests, therefore, that the purpose of a business is always to create as much value as possible for stakeholders and therefore for the business to succeed and become sustainable in future the business executives must keep the interests of the customers and all other stakeholders in the business aligned and going in the same direction. The theory, therefore, argues that every business creates or destroys customer values as well as that of the communities, suppliers, financiers, and employees. The general idea about the theory is that it tries to answer what an organization should be and how it shall be conceptualized. The theory or concept it should be thought of as a grouping of stakeholders and the purpose of the organization is said that it should be aimed at managing the stakeholders needs, interests, and recipients. The business stakeholders, in this case, include customers, local communities, employees, shareholders, as well as distributors. The theory, therefore, builds a framework responsive to the concerns of the managers who are being confronted with unprecedented levels of environmental change. The company decisions in many ways affect the stakeholders and therefore the company through the managers has to build specific ethics principles whereas decisions made out of consideration of their impacts are usually ought to be. Therefore, the theory is important in the analysis of the behavior of Wells Fargo company employees and provides a vital role for the managem ent of the company to respond appropriately to enhance the company internal control mechanisms as well as the decision-making processes of the company. Criticisms of the stakeholder theory The theory has however been criticized by a number of people for a number of reasons in which most critics just like Teppo feels that the theory is not sufficient and therefore offers an unrealistic view of how organizations operate (Lankoski et al., 2016). In his view, an organization is said to be a shell that can be written upon freely by various groups surrounding the company that lay a claim to the company. Therefore, the functions of the company do not revolve around meeting the interests of their stakeholders but operate in a broader perspective in which it has to achieve certain goals and objectives. The theory has also been criticized that it does not sufficiently explain why a stakeholder is as it broad. It suggests that the company stakeholder community should include everyone who is affected by an organization. However, the argument the critics are of the view that the theory should distinguish between non stakeholders influencers in the company and the true influencers as the concept of stakeholdership is a concept which is more than just a union o influence and impact (Bridoux et al., 2016). Lastly, the theory has also been criticized as lacking an explicit specification of the relationship between stakeholders and economic reasoning. This is because the theory in one hand has achieved a certain degree of acceptance in the company strategic management functions but on the other hand, there is substantial economic resistance to the shareholders (Schneider et al., 2017). However, the criticisms do not affect the relevance of the theory in defining the organizational responsib ility towards shareholders as it the case Wells Fargo Company that has a great responsibility towards the stakeholder community. Personal evaluation of the theory in relation to Wells Fargo Unethical behavior This theory, therefore, provides a basis of understanding of the responsibility and the role-played by the company management team and especially by the manager in meeting the demands of the company stakeholders. In other words, managers have a greater responsibility towards the stakeholders of the company other than just in the economic value of the company and will do anything, in this case, to meet and protect the interests of the stakeholders. For instance, in the case of our company in which the employees created fake accounts using the real names of customers. The company reputation and image was destroyed and the company had to take full responsibility to ensure that it owns its mistakes as a company for lack of internal control mechanisms to deal with such issues and committed itself in compensation of the loss incurred by their customers who form part of their stakeholders. Despite the mistakes arising from stakeholders, the company had to deal with them separately after own ing to their mistakes as a company. Conclusion Business ethics in any organized form a very important role in enhancing the growth and development of the company as well as helping the company to become socially and corporately responsible. Every organization has an established ethics and code of conducts that have been developed to guide the company operations according to the established standards and ensuring that they minimize the chances of unethical behavior from the employees or any other which may affect the growth and development of the company (Kristen, 2015). A good leadership is very important as it helps in promotion of an effective organizational ethical culture. The managers must take into consideration ethical factors as they may influence the management and the company leadership to make sound decisions to protect organizations from unethical behavior. Unethical behavior can have negative impacts and implications to the growth of a company from destroying the reputation of the company, loss of confidence with the company by stakeholders from both prospective and potential customers as well as to the community in which the company serves (Ketokivi Mahoney, 2016). It is therefore important for Wells and Fargo Company to work on its ethics and code of conduct in order to improve the performance of the company and restore the company lost glory and reputation. Due to this matter, it is therefore recommended that the company should adopt a policy measure that takes into account the ethical behavior of the employees and defines their responsibility toward the company stakeholders and especially towards the customers (GrandySliwa, 2017). It is also recommended that the company should also develop an internal control measure that takes into account the monitoring and evaluation of the activities and operations of every employee in the organization. Such a measure will ensure these unethical behaviors are established and determined early enough before they put the company into great financial crisis as well as help company develop effective measures for those found culprits of unethical behavior in the company. References Arnold, D. G. (2016).Three Models of Impactful Business Ethics Scholarship.Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4), ix-xii. doi:10.1017/beq.2016.69 Ayios, A., Jeurissen, R., Manning, P., Spence, L. J. (2014). Social capital: a review from an ethics perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1), 108-124. doi:10.1111/beer.12040 Bhasa, M. P. (2017). Normative Ethical Theories as Frameworks for Better Corporate Governance: A Practitioner's Perspective. IUP Journal Of Corporate Governance, 16(2), 29-38 Bridoux, F., Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships And Social Welfare: A Behavioral Theory Of Contributions To Joint Value Creation. Academy Of Management Review, 41(2), 229-251. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0475 Burrell, G. g. (2017).Virtual Special Issue on 'Sociology and Business Ethics'.Journal Of Business Ethics, 144(1), 1-4 Cavico, F. J., Mujtaba, B. G. (2017). Wells Fargo's Fake Accounts Scandal and its Legal and Ethical Implications for Management. SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075), 82(2), 4-19 Doh, J., Husted, B. W., Yang, X. (2016). Guest Editors Introduction: Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Developing Country Multinationals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3), 301-315. doi:10.1017/beq.2016.40 Fok, L. y., Payne, D. d., Corey, C. c. (2016). Cultural Values, Utilitarian Orientation, and Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of U.S. and Puerto Rican Professionals. Journal Of Business Ethics, 134(2), 263-279. Francs-Gmez, P., Sacconi, L., Faillo, M. (2015).Experimental economics as a method for normative business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24S41-S53. doi:10.1111/beer.12096 Fryer, M. m. (2016).A Role for Ethics Theory in Speculative Business Ethics Teaching.Journal Of Business Ethics, 138(1), 79-90. Grandy, G. g., Sliwa, M. m. (2017). Contemplative Leadership: The Possibilities for the Ethics of Leadership Theory and Practice. Journal Of Business Ethics, 143(3), 423-440 Kaptein, M. m. (2017). The Battle for Business Ethics: A Struggle Theory. Journal Of Business Ethics, 144(2), 343-361 Ketokivi, M., Mahoney, J. T. (2016). Transaction Cost Economics As a Constructive Stakeholder Theory. Academy Of Management Learning Education, 15(1), 123-138. doi:10.5465/amle.2015.0133 Kristen, J. (2015). Stakeholders Theory- How They Influence The Business Policy. Scholedge International Journal Of Business Policy Governance, 2(4), 14-17 Lankoski, L., Smith, N. C., Van Wassenhove, L. (2016).Stakeholder Judgments of Value. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 227-256. doi:10.1017/beq.2016.28 Neesham, C. c., Gu, J. j. (2015). Strengthening Moral Judgment: A Moral Identity-Based Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics Education.Journal Of Business Ethics, 131(3), 527-534 Preuss, L., Barkemeyer, R., Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Country Multinationals: Identifying Company and Country-Level Influences. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3), 347-378. doi:10.1017/beq.2016.42 Rath, A. K. (2016). Emerging Landscape of Corporate Ethics and Social Responsibility - Challenges and Options.Journal Of Institute Of Public Enterprise, 39(3/4), 137-154. Schneider, T. t., Sachs, S. s. (2017). The Impact of Stakeholder Identities on Value Creation in Issue-Based Stakeholder Networks. Journal Of Business Ethics, 144(1), 41-57 Yazdani, N. S., Murad, H. r. (2015).Toward an Ethical Theory of Organizing.Journal Of Business Ethics, 127(2), 399-417